Comparing CPUs...
Select two CPUs above, then click Compare →
How CPU Benchmark Scores Work
This tool uses three complementary benchmark metrics because no single number captures a CPU's real-world performance across all workloads. Passmark Single Thread Rating measures the performance of one CPU core — this is the number that matters most for gaming, since most game engines are bottlenecked by a single fast thread rather than many slow ones. Passmark CPU Mark measures total throughput across all cores simultaneously — critical for video rendering, 3D compilation, running local AI models, and streaming while gaming. Cinebench R24 is a vendor-neutral pure rendering benchmark that directly measures how fast a CPU can render a 3D scene — it's the standard used by content creators and the PC press when comparing CPUs across generations.
The Gaming Index is derived from averaging frame rates across 10 CPU-sensitive titles (CS2, Baldur's Gate 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024, Starfield, Cyberpunk 2077 CPU mode, and others) with an RTX 4090 paired to eliminate GPU bottlenecks, all at 1080p Ultra. The Core i9-13900K is fixed at 100 as the reference point. A score of 104 means approximately 4% more average FPS in CPU-limited scenarios.
Intel Arrow Lake vs AMD Ryzen 9000 in 2026
The Ryzen 9000 series (Zen 5 architecture) and Intel Arrow Lake (Core Ultra 200-series) represent two fundamentally different design philosophies. Ryzen 9000 chips — particularly the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 5 9600X — achieve leading Passmark single-thread scores (4700+) while staying within a 65W TDP envelope. This makes them exceptionally efficient: the 9700X delivers better gaming performance than a Core i9-13900K while drawing 75% less power under load.
Arrow Lake took a different approach: Intel removed Hyper-Threading from P-cores and redesigned the uncore for efficiency. The result is CPUs that run cooler and draw less power than Raptor Lake, but trade some multi-threaded performance in the process. In pure multi-core benchmarks, Arrow Lake sits between Raptor Lake Refresh and Ryzen 9000 — competitive but not dominant. Where Arrow Lake wins is platform: LGA1851 is Intel's next-generation socket, and high-end Z890 motherboards are available at prices comparable to AMD's X670E boards.
| Factor | Intel Arrow Lake | AMD Ryzen 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Single-Core | Good (3000–3100 STR) | Excellent (4580–4950 STR) |
| Multi-Core | Good (26K–41K) | Excellent (24K–73K) |
| Power Draw | Very low (125W max) | 65W (8-core) or 120–170W (12–16 core) |
| Gaming | Slightly behind Zen 5 | Leads by ~5–8% in CPU-limited titles |
| Platform Longevity | LGA1851 (new in 2024) | AM5 (committed through 2027+) |
When Single-Core Speed Matters More Than Core Count
The persistent myth that "more cores = faster gaming" leads people to overspend on workstation CPUs for pure gaming rigs. The reality is that most game engines in 2026 still run their physics, AI, and rendering submission logic on 2–4 threads. The frame rate you see in a game is limited by how fast those 2–4 threads run — which is determined by single-core IPC and boost clock speed, not total core count.
A Ryzen 5 9600X (6-core, 65W, $279) with a 4580 Passmark single-thread score will produce higher minimum frame rates in most games than a Core i9-14900K (24-core, 253W, $399) with a 4500 single-thread score — because the 9600X's Zen 5 IPC advantage more than compensates for its lower core count in gaming scenarios. However, for workloads that genuinely use all cores — Blender rendering, video encoding, code compilation, running local LLMs — the 24-core i9-14900K with 63,000 Passmark Multi is significantly faster. Choose your CPU for your actual workload, not the headline core count.
Should You Upgrade from 13th or 14th Gen Intel?
The Core i9-14900K is essentially the same silicon as the i9-13900K with a modest clock speed bump. Benchmark scores differ by less than 5% between the two generations — not worth a CPU-only upgrade. If you are on a 12th Gen Intel (Alder Lake) or earlier, the performance gap to Ryzen 9000 or Arrow Lake justifies a platform upgrade. If you are on 13th or 14th Gen, you are better served by a GPU upgrade or faster RAM before considering a CPU swap.
Arrow Lake does offer a meaningful upgrade path for 12th Gen users who want to stay on Intel: the LGA1851 socket is expected to support future Arrow Lake-S refreshes, giving it comparable longevity to AM5. However, AMD's explicit commitment to AM5 through at least 2027 and Ryzen 9000's clear IPC advantage make the AM5 platform the stronger long-term investment for most gaming-focused builds in 2026.
Understanding CPU TDP: Marketing vs Reality
Intel publishes two TDP figures: a base TDP (e.g., 125W) and a Maximum Turbo Power (MTP). The i9-14900K has a 125W base TDP but a 253W MTP — and most high-end Z790 motherboards ship with MTP limits removed, meaning the CPU draws up to 253W during sustained all-core load. This is the number that matters for cooling requirements and electricity costs. AMD's TDP figures are more representative of real-world power draw: a 65W Ryzen 7 9700X genuinely draws around 65–75W under gaming load.
The practical implication: if you are building with an i9-14900K or i9-14900KF, you need a 360mm AIO or high-end air cooler rated for 250W+. A Ryzen 7 9700X can be cooled adequately by a mid-range 65W air cooler. The power difference also shows up in your electricity bill — see our PC Power Consumption Calculator for exact monthly cost estimates.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Ryzen 9000 better than Intel Arrow Lake for gaming?
Yes, by a small but consistent margin. Ryzen 9000's Zen 5 architecture delivers ~5–8% more average FPS in CPU-limited titles due to its higher IPC and stronger single-core performance. However, in the vast majority of GPU-bound gaming scenarios (which is most gaming above RTX 4070 level at 1440p or 4K), both platforms produce identical frame rates — the GPU is the bottleneck, not the CPU. The difference only becomes visible at 1080p with a high-end GPU, or in specific CPU-bound titles like Cyberpunk 2077 in CPU-limited areas, Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024, and the Baldur's Gate 3 city zones.
What does Passmark single-core score mean for gaming?
Passmark Single Thread Rating measures the speed of a single CPU core on a mixed workload that includes integer math, floating point, compression, and memory operations. A higher score generally means better gaming performance because game engines schedule critical path work on a small number of fast threads. It correlates strongly with 1% low frame times — the stutters and hitches players feel as "smoothness" rather than raw average FPS. A CPU with a single-thread score of 4700 will produce noticeably smoother minimum frame rates than a CPU with a score of 3000, even if both hit the same average FPS.
Should I upgrade from a Core i9-13900K or i9-14900K?
No, not unless your workflow is severely bottlenecked. The i9-13900K and i9-14900K are functionally identical CPUs — 14th Gen adds minimal clock speed headroom at identical silicon. Upgrading to Ryzen 9000 or Arrow Lake would require a new motherboard (platform change), and the real-world gaming performance difference is under 5%. The money is far better spent on a faster GPU or an NVMe SSD upgrade. Consider a CPU platform change only when coming from 10th Gen or earlier.
Is a higher Passmark Multi score always better?
Not for gaming. Passmark Multi rewards total throughput across all cores and heavily favors CPUs with higher core counts. The i9-14900K's 63,000 Multi score looks impressive versus the Ryzen 5 9600X's 24,500, but in games, the 9600X's superior single-thread score produces equal or better gaming frame rates. For productivity workloads — Blender, DaVinci Resolve, code compilation, software encoding, running local LLMs — the multi-core score is the better predictor. Match the metric to your workload.
Which CPU is best for streaming while gaming?
Software encoding (x264 or x265) is a heavily multi-threaded workload. The minimum comfortable setup for 1080p60 software encoding + modern AAA gaming simultaneously is a 12-core CPU: Ryzen 9 9900X or Core i9-14900K. Anything under 8 cores will produce stutters or dropped frames in demanding games when the encoder load spikes. Hardware encoding on NVIDIA (NVENC) or AMD (AMF) is a better option for lower-core-count systems — it offloads encoding to the GPU and barely impacts game frame rates.
Does AM5 or LGA1851 offer a better upgrade path?
AM5 currently has the stronger upgrade path commitment. AMD has confirmed AM5 socket support through at least 2027, meaning future Zen 6 and Zen 7 chips will slot into existing AM5 motherboards. Intel has not made equivalent multi-generation commitments for LGA1851, which launched with Arrow Lake in late 2024. For users who upgrade CPUs every 2–3 years, AM5's longevity makes it the lower long-term platform investment even if the upfront cost is slightly higher on premium X670E boards.
Related Calculators
CPU & GPU Bottleneck Calculator
Detect whether your CPU or GPU is limiting performance
CPU & GPU Thermal TDP Calculator
Find the right cooler for your CPU's real power draw
PC Power Consumption & Electricity Cost
Calculate monthly electricity cost for any CPU + GPU build
GPU FPS Estimator by Game
Estimate FPS for 45 GPUs across 35+ games at any resolution
PC Build Budget Planner
Allocate your PC build budget intelligently across components
PSU Wattage Calculator
Find the correct PSU size for your complete build